Screener
SCHQ vs TLT
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF vs iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCHQ costs 0.12% less per year.
- TLT is significantly larger than SCHQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TLT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHQ | TLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $897M | $42.9B |
| Since | 2019 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 4.76% | 4.57% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.3% | -2.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.1% | -6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.31 | -0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.07% | 9.95% |
| Max drawdown | -46.13% | -48.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHQ and TLT
Explore further