Screener
TLT vs SCHR
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF vs Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHR costs 0.12% less per year.
- TLT is significantly larger than SCHR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TLT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TLT | SCHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42.9B | $13.0B |
| Since | 2002 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 4.57% | 3.89% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.3% | +2.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.1% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.35 | -0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.95% | 3.46% |
| Max drawdown | -48.35% | -16.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TLT and SCHR
Explore further