Screener
SCHQ vs TUA
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF vs Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- SCHQ costs 0.22% less per year.
- SCHQ is classified as fixed income, while TUA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SCHQ follows a index tracking strategy; TUA uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHQ | TUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $897M | $802M |
| Since | 2019 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.76% | 3.63% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | -1.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.3% | -2.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.31 | -0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.07% | 6.85% |
| Max drawdown | -46.13% | -15.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHQ and TUA
Explore further