Screener
TUA vs SCHO
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF vs Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHO costs 0.22% less per year.
- SCHO is significantly larger than TUA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TUA is classified as alternative, while SCHO is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- TUA follows a active selection strategy; SCHO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUA | SCHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $802M | $12.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 3.97% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.8% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.2% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.58 | 0.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.85% | 1.38% |
| Max drawdown | -15.85% | -5.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUA and SCHO
Explore further