Screener
SCHV vs FLV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF vs American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- SCHV costs 0.38% less per year.
- SCHV is significantly larger than FLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHV follows a index tracking strategy; FLV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHV | FLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.2B | $347M |
| Since | 2009 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +13.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.69% | 10.09% |
| Max drawdown | -37.08% | -15.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHV and FLV
Explore further