Screener
SCHV vs IWN
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- SCHV costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHV | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.2B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2009 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.69% | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -37.08% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHV and IWN
Explore further