Screener
SCJ vs AAXJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- SCJ costs 0.22% less per year.
- AAXJ is significantly larger than SCJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCJ | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $235M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +48.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.0% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.10% | 19.80% |
| Max drawdown | -37.28% | -44.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCJ and AAXJ
Explore further