Screener
SCJ vs FLJH
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF vs Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
Key differences
- FLJH costs 0.41% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, FLJH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCJ | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $235M | $143M |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 5.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +47.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.0% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | +20.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.10% | 18.28% |
| Max drawdown | -37.28% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCJ and FLJH
Explore further