Screener
SCJ vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF vs Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- FLAX costs 0.31% less per year.
- SCJ is significantly larger than FLAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCJ | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $235M | $47M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 2.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +48.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.0% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.10% | 18.62% |
| Max drawdown | -37.28% | -42.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCJ and FLAX
Explore further