Screener
SCJ vs KOKU
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
Key differences
Both SCJ and KOKU are equity ETFs. SCJ charges 0.50% a year and KOKU 0.09%. The main difference: SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; KOKU covers global markets.
- SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; KOKU covers global markets.
- KOKU costs 0.41% less per year.
- KOKU is much larger than SCJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, KOKU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCJ | KOKU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $805M |
| Since | 2007 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.70% | 1.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.22% | 12.49% |
| Max drawdown | -37.28% | -25.77% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.