Screener
SCMC vs FUSI
Sterling Capital Multi-strategy Income Etf vs American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF
Key differences
- FUSI costs 0.28% less per year.
- SCMC is significantly larger than FUSI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCMC is classified as fixed income, while FUSI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SCMC follows a active selection strategy; FUSI uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCMC | FUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $198M | $23M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.44% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 2.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.90% |
| Max drawdown | -1.91% | -0.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCMC and FUSI
Explore further