Screener
FUSI vs CGMS
American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF
Key differences
- FUSI costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGMS is significantly larger than FUSI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FUSI is classified as alternative, while CGMS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- FUSI follows a tactical allocation strategy; CGMS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CGMS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FUSI | CGMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $23M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 5.44% | 5.93% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.0% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.07 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.90% | 3.49% |
| Max drawdown | -0.70% | -4.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FUSI and CGMS
Explore further