Screener
SCUB vs CRUX
Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF vs Columbia Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CRUX is significantly larger than SCUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCUB | CRUX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2012 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 4.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -0.16% | -1.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCUB and CRUX
Explore further