Screener
SCUB vs FLUD
Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF vs Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
Both SCUB and FLUD are fixed income ETFs. SCUB charges 0.30% a year and FLUD 0.15%. The main difference: SCUB follows a active selection strategy; FLUD uses index tracking.
- SCUB follows a active selection strategy; FLUD uses index tracking.
- FLUD costs 0.15% less per year.
- FLUD is much larger than SCUB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCUB | FLUD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $395M |
| Since | 2012 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 3.87% | 4.35% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.65% |
| Max drawdown | -0.16% | -1.67% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.