Screener
SCZ vs CNYA
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
- SCZ costs 0.20% less per year.
- SCZ is significantly larger than CNYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCZ covers global ex us markets; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, SCZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCZ | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.4B | $238M |
| Since | 2007 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 1.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +35.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.50% | 17.18% |
| Max drawdown | -41.07% | -49.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCZ and CNYA
Explore further