Screener
SCZ vs EEMS
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCZ costs 0.32% less per year.
- SCZ is significantly larger than EEMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCZ covers global ex us markets; EEMS covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EEMS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCZ | EEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.4B | $452M |
| Since | 2007 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.44% | 16.93% |
| Max drawdown | -41.07% | -48.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCZ and EEMS
Explore further