Screener
SCZ vs EFU
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF vs ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- SCZ costs 0.55% less per year.
- SCZ is significantly larger than EFU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCZ follows a index tracking strategy; EFU uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, SCZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCZ | EFU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.4B | $0.9M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 5.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | -32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | -23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | -16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | -0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.50% | 31.13% |
| Max drawdown | -41.07% | -90.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCZ and EFU
Explore further