Screener
SCZ vs ISCF
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- ISCF costs 0.16% less per year.
- SCZ is significantly larger than ISCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCZ covers global ex us markets; ISCF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, ISCF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCZ | ISCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.4B | $633M |
| Since | 2007 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 3.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +25.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.44% | 14.40% |
| Max drawdown | -41.07% | -40.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCZ and ISCF
Explore further