Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SDD vs TWM

ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 vs ProShares UltraShort Russell2000

SDD

ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$2M

TWM

ProShares UltraShort Russell2000

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$47M

Key differences

  • TWM is significantly larger than SDD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SDD has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SDDTWM
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$47M
Since20072007
Dividend yield6.06%5.86%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-42.9%-50.6%
CAGR 3Y-25.4%-30.3%
CAGR 5Y-15.7%-17.8%
Sharpe 3Y-0.58-0.72
Volatility 1Y36.23%38.36%
Max drawdown-96.15%-96.49%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SDD and TWM