Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SDD vs RWM

ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 vs ProShares Short Russell2000

SDD

ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$2M

RWM

ProShares Short Russell2000

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$143M

Key differences

  • RWM is significantly larger than SDD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, RWM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SDDRWM
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$143M
Since20072007
Dividend yield6.06%3.99%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-42.9%-27.3%
CAGR 3Y-25.4%-12.8%
CAGR 5Y-15.7%-5.6%
Sharpe 3Y-0.58-0.70
Volatility 1Y36.23%19.10%
Max drawdown-96.15%-73.30%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SDD and RWM