Screener
SDOG vs OEFA
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF vs ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF
Key differences
- SDOG costs 0.12% less per year.
- SDOG is significantly larger than OEFA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SDOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SDOG | OEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $37M |
| Since | 2012 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.42% | 2.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.46% | 16.03% |
| Max drawdown | -43.56% | -33.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SDOG and OEFA
Explore further