Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SDS vs SKF

ProShares UltraShort S&P500 vs ProShares UltraShort Financials

SDS

ProShares UltraShort S&P500

ProShares

Annual cost

0.91%

Fund size

$443M

SKF

ProShares UltraShort Financials

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$16M

Key differences

  • SDS is significantly larger than SKF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SKF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SDSSKF
Annual cost (TER)0.91%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$443M$16M
Since20062007
Dividend yield5.29%4.31%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-37.7%-4.1%
CAGR 3Y-29.6%-25.2%
CAGR 5Y-22.8%-16.7%
Sharpe 3Y-1.16-0.85
Volatility 1Y23.88%28.99%
Max drawdown-96.42%-96.51%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SDS and SKF