Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SKF vs SPXU

ProShares UltraShort Financials vs ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500

SKF

ProShares UltraShort Financials

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$16M

SPXU

ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500

ProShares

Annual cost

0.90%

Fund size

$562M

Key differences

  • SPXU is significantly larger than SKF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SKF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SKFSPXU
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.90%
Fund size (AUM)$16M$562M
Since20072009
Dividend yield4.31%6.87%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-4.1%-52.5%
CAGR 3Y-25.2%-43.9%
CAGR 5Y-16.7%-35.8%
Sharpe 3Y-0.85-1.17
Volatility 1Y28.99%35.84%
Max drawdown-96.51%-99.61%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SKF and SPXU