Screener
SECT vs CGMS
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMS costs 0.30% less per year.
- SECT is classified as equity, while CGMS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; CGMS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SECT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | CGMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $4.7B |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 5.93% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.14% | 3.49% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -4.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and CGMS
Explore further