Screener
SECT vs CGMU
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.42% less per year.
- SECT is classified as equity, while CGMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SECT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $5.8B |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.14% | 2.28% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and CGMU
Explore further