Screener
SECT vs DFAT
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF
Key differences
- DFAT costs 0.41% less per year.
- DFAT is significantly larger than SECT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SECT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | DFAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $13.7B |
| Since | 2017 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +33.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | 16.99% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -26.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and DFAT
Explore further