Screener
SECT vs FFLS
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Key differences
Both SECT and FFLS are alternative ETFs. SECT charges 0.69% a year and FFLS 1.60%. The main difference: SECT follows a option income strategy; FFLS uses long short.
- SECT follows a option income strategy; FFLS uses long short.
- SECT costs 0.91% less per year.
- SECT is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $43M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 0.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.5% | -5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.60% | 9.28% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -11.05% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.