Screener
SECT vs FISR
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- FISR costs 0.19% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than FISR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT is classified as equity, while FISR is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; FISR uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SECT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | FISR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $514M |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 4.11% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +3.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | -0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | -0.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.14% | 4.41% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -20.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and FISR
Explore further