Screener
SECT vs TMAT
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Main Thematic Innovation ETF
Key differences
- SECT costs 0.13% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than TMAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT is classified as equity, while TMAT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; TMAT uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | TMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.82% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $211M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 0.02% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | +41.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.14% | 23.91% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -58.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and TMAT
Explore further