Screener
TMAT vs CCOR
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- TMAT costs 0.47% less per year.
- TMAT is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, TMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $28M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.0% | -4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.6% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | -2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.91% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and CCOR
Explore further