Screener
SECU vs IFGL
iShares Securitized Income Active ETF vs iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF
Key differences
- SECU costs 0.08% less per year.
- SECU is significantly larger than IFGL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECU is classified as alternative, while IFGL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SECU covers north america markets; IFGL covers global.
- SECU follows a multi strategy strategy; IFGL uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECU | IFGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $592M | $88M |
| Since | 2005 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.99% | 3.68% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.68% |
| Max drawdown | -1.76% | -40.38% |
Similar to SECU and IFGL
Explore further