Screener
SECU vs REET
iShares Securitized Income Active ETF vs iShares Global REIT ETF
Key differences
- REET costs 0.26% less per year.
- REET is significantly larger than SECU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECU is classified as alternative, while REET is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SECU covers north america markets; REET covers global.
- SECU follows a multi strategy strategy; REET uses index tracking.
- SECU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECU | REET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $592M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2005 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.99% | 3.36% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +17.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.05% |
| Max drawdown | -1.76% | -44.59% |
Similar to SECU and REET
Explore further