Screener
SECU vs IMTB
iShares Securitized Income Active ETF vs iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- IMTB costs 0.34% less per year.
- SECU is classified as alternative, while IMTB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SECU follows a multi strategy strategy; IMTB uses index tracking.
- SECU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECU | IMTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $592M | $280M |
| Since | 2005 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.99% | 4.46% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.06% |
| Max drawdown | -1.76% | -18.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECU and IMTB
Explore further