Screener
SECU vs ISTB
iShares Securitized Income Active ETF vs iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- ISTB costs 0.34% less per year.
- ISTB is significantly larger than SECU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECU is classified as alternative, while ISTB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SECU follows a multi strategy strategy; ISTB uses index tracking.
- SECU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECU | ISTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $592M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2005 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.99% | 4.20% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.77% |
| Max drawdown | -1.76% | -9.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECU and ISTB
Explore further