Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SECU vs MBB

iShares Securitized Income Active ETF vs iShares MBS ETF

SECU

iShares Securitized Income Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$592M

MBB

iShares MBS ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.04%

Fund size

$38.3B

Key differences

  • MBB costs 0.36% less per year.
  • MBB is significantly larger than SECU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SECU is classified as alternative, while MBB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
  • SECU follows a multi strategy strategy; MBB uses index tracking.

Side-by-side comparison

SECUMBB
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.04%
Fund size (AUM)$592M$38.3B
Since20052007
Dividend yield4.99%4.23%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategymulti strategyindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+7.4%
CAGR 3YN/A+4.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+0.3%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.11
Volatility 1Y4.54%
Max drawdown-1.76%-17.65%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SECU and MBB