Screener
SECU vs MBBA
iShares Securitized Income Active ETF vs iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF
Key differences
- MBBA costs 0.15% less per year.
- SECU is significantly larger than MBBA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECU is classified as alternative, while MBBA is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SECU follows a multi strategy strategy; MBBA uses index tracking.
- MBBA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECU | MBBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $592M | $125M |
| Since | 2005 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 4.99% | 3.98% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -1.76% | -2.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECU and MBBA
Explore further