Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SEF vs REW

ProShares Short Financials vs ProShares UltraShort Technology

SEF

ProShares Short Financials

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$18M

REW

ProShares UltraShort Technology

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$4M

Key differences

  • SEF is significantly larger than REW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SEF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SEFREW
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$18M$4M
Since20082007
Dividend yield3.44%7.20%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y+0.0%-61.2%
CAGR 3Y-11.2%-46.9%
CAGR 5Y-6.0%-39.3%
Sharpe 3Y-0.89-1.17
Volatility 1Y14.38%41.51%
Max drawdown-75.66%-99.74%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SEF and REW