Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SEF vs SPXU

ProShares Short Financials vs ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500

SEF

ProShares Short Financials

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$18M

SPXU

ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500

ProShares

Annual cost

0.90%

Fund size

$562M

Key differences

  • SPXU is significantly larger than SEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SEF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SEFSPXU
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.90%
Fund size (AUM)$18M$562M
Since20082009
Dividend yield3.44%6.87%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y+0.6%-52.5%
CAGR 3Y-10.8%-43.9%
CAGR 5Y-6.1%-35.8%
Sharpe 3Y-0.86-1.17
Volatility 1Y14.40%35.84%
Max drawdown-75.66%-99.61%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SEF and SPXU