Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SPXU vs SKF

ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 vs ProShares UltraShort Financials

SPXU

ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500

ProShares

Annual cost

0.90%

Fund size

$562M

SKF

ProShares UltraShort Financials

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$16M

Key differences

  • SPXU is significantly larger than SKF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SKF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SPXUSKF
Annual cost (TER)0.90%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$562M$16M
Since20092007
Dividend yield6.87%4.31%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-52.5%-4.1%
CAGR 3Y-43.9%-25.2%
CAGR 5Y-35.8%-16.7%
Sharpe 3Y-1.17-0.85
Volatility 1Y35.84%28.99%
Max drawdown-99.61%-96.51%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SPXU and SKF