Screener
SEPI vs BALQ
Shelton Equity Premium Income ETF vs iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF
Key differences
- BALQ costs 0.19% less per year.
- SEPI is significantly larger than BALQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SEPI is classified as alternative, while BALQ is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SEPI follows a option income strategy; BALQ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SEPI | BALQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $14M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -7.66% | -11.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SEPI and BALQ
Explore further