Screener
SETM vs GBUG
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- SETM costs 0.25% less per year.
- SETM is significantly larger than GBUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SETM follows a index tracking strategy; GBUG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SETM | GBUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $617M | $164M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 1.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | +74.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.37% | 47.45% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -32.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SETM and GBUG
Explore further