Screener
SGDJ vs GDXJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF vs VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- GDXJ is significantly larger than SGDJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SGDJ follows a active selection strategy; GDXJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SGDJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GDXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGDJ | GDXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $330M | $8.7B |
| Since | 2015 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 7.97% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +91.5% | +78.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +48.4% | +45.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | +18.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 48.45% | 49.67% |
| Max drawdown | -59.27% | -57.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGDJ and GDXJ
Explore further