Screener
SGDM vs GDX
Sprott Gold Miners ETF vs VanEck Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- GDX is significantly larger than SGDM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SGDM follows a active selection strategy; GDX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GDX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GDX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGDM | GDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.51% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $660M | $27.3B |
| Since | 2014 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +66.9% | +70.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.0% | +40.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.5% | +18.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.78% | 45.53% |
| Max drawdown | -49.69% | -49.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGDM and GDX
Explore further