Screener
SGDM vs GDXJ
Sprott Gold Miners ETF vs VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDM costs 0.06% less per year.
- GDXJ is significantly larger than SGDM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SGDM follows a active selection strategy; GDXJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GDXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GDXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGDM | GDXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $660M | $8.7B |
| Since | 2014 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +66.9% | +78.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.0% | +45.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.5% | +18.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.78% | 49.67% |
| Max drawdown | -49.69% | -57.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGDM and GDXJ
Explore further