Screener
SGDM vs RING
Sprott Gold Miners ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING costs 0.07% less per year.
- RING is significantly larger than SGDM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SGDM follows a active selection strategy; RING uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RING has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGDM | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $660M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2014 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +66.9% | +77.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.0% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.5% | +19.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.78% | 46.02% |
| Max drawdown | -49.69% | -52.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGDM and RING
Explore further