Screener
SGRT vs ILCG
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF vs iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
Key differences
- SGRT follows a active selection strategy; ILCG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGRT | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $2.9B |
| Since | — | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -17.87% | -35.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGRT and ILCG
Explore further