Screener
SGRT vs ISCG
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF vs iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- SGRT follows a active selection strategy; ISCG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGRT | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $947M |
| Since | — | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +34.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.24% |
| Max drawdown | -17.87% | -41.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGRT and ISCG
Explore further