Screener
SGRT vs RPG
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- SGRT follows a active selection strategy; RPG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGRT | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $1.8B |
| Since | — | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.79% |
| Max drawdown | -17.87% | -36.58% |
Similar to SGRT and RPG
Explore further