Screener
SGRW vs IJK
Harbor Active Small Cap Growth ETF vs iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
Key differences
- SGRW follows a active selection strategy; IJK uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGRW | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $10.6B |
| Since | — | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.09% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -39.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGRW and IJK
Explore further