Screener
SGRW vs IVOG
Harbor Active Small Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- SGRW follows a active selection strategy; IVOG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGRW | IVOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $1.7B |
| Since | — | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.19% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -39.32% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGRW and IVOG
Explore further